12/29/2023 0 Comments Top rated investment newsletters![]() ![]() Even the best newsletters will have rotten years. If you're not always near a computer, or if you don't want to take the time to make the trades, look elsewhere.įinally, once you pick a newsletter you like, try to stick with it for several years. For instance, some newsletters require frequent trades. Make sure you'll be comfortable with its trading style and advice. Take a look at a newsletter's home page and get a sample issue before you subscribe. (I haven't listed the prices because almost all of them periodically offer specials at their Web sites.) On a $10,000 portfolio, $150 is 1.5% annually - a huge chunk. The newsletters above cost $150 or more annually. Pick the Best Letterīefore you subscribe to any newsletter, be sure you're investing enough to make it worthwhile. But Hulbert doesn't count that trade against Brinker's record because Brinker didn't make it in his newsletter's model portfolios. Indeed, Hulbert notes that Brinker incorrectly forecast a bear market rally in late 2000, recommending a losing trade in the Nasdaq 100 index. Over the past ten years, he's gained an annualized 13.2%, with 19% less volatility than the market.Ī note: After I wrote about Brinker's newsletter two years ago, I received several e-mails from angry readers claiming Hulbert didn't accurately reflect all of Brinker's predictions. ![]() The returns you get with Stock Advisor are unrivaled, yet it’s also one of the most affordable services around. Although Brinker's fund picks have slightly lagged the market on average, his timing moves have put him ahead of the market. Motley Fool Stock Advisor Motley Fool Stock Advisor is the flagship service of The Motley Fool, and it’s one of our favorite investment newsletters. I wrote about this and other fund-momentum newsletters in Kiplinger's Personal Finance magazine last year (see "They Ride the Hot Funds," March 2004).īob Brinker's Marketimer is in fourth place. It has returned an annualized 19.3% over the past ten years with just a bit more volatility than the Wilshire. Third is No Load Fund*X, which switches into funds with the best short-term results. It has returned an annualized 14.2% over the past ten years with 25% less volatility than the Wilshire. Ranking second is Investment Quality Trends, which focuses on big, dividend-paying stocks. His recommendations have never lost more than 7% in any 12-month period. But it has produced those results with 54% less volatility than the index.Įditor Stephen Mckee has added value both through shrewd timing moves and good fund selection, Hulbert says. It has returned an annualized 10.3%, compared with 11.9% for the broad-based Wilshire 5000. A monthly ETF newsletter from Trackinsight that covers the months most popular investing insights, articles, videos, trends, and the latest research on ETFs (. Indeed, the top newsletter of the past ten years (through the end of 2004) is No-Load Mutual Fund Selections and Timing. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |